Thursday, August 5, 2010

REST DAY: METABOLIC PATHWAYS


CrossFit's last fitness standard covers the three metabolic pathways/systems or 'engines' that provide energy for all human action and activity.
  1. Phosphagen pathway - dominates the highest powered activities which require maximum power output and effort. Each effort within this pathway last anywhere between 1-10 seconds in duration. 1/3/5 rep heavy max lifts are examples of this pathway.
  2. Glycolytic pathway - dominates moderate powered activities that last up to several minutes in duration of effort. Tabata intervals; max reps of push ups in 2mins; 'metcon' type WODs, are great examples.
  3. Oxidative pathway - dominates low powered activity which last in excess of several minutes. 5K run or row; long distance swimming etc.
The total fitness that CrossFit is after, aka GPP or general physical preparedness, is exactly what we are promoting and developing. This requires us to be adept and competent in each of these three pathways. Depending on how we choose to utilize each pathway within a workout will determine the type of stimulus and effect we are attempting to illicit.

Many of us, especially non-CrossFitter's, favor one or two to of these pathways and strictly stay within that system for the majority of our training. What this inevitably does is blunt our goal in achieving the general 'total' fitness we are after. If we train too long in one pathway, then we are technically specializing, vice attempting to become good at all three and gradually raising our bell curve across the board (does 'increasing work capacity' sound familiar?). Doing nothing but lift heavy weight will make us strong & powerful, but will decrease our endurance/stamina capacity; running solely long distances will degrade our strength and explosiveness; working strictly on bodyweight calisthenics at the expense of other modalities will ensure that we are one dimensional.

Knowing & understanding these pathways is the key to achieving competency in the 10 general physical skills we covered last week. By varying these systems, we improve and increase our strengths across the board which in turn will improve and increase our capacity to prepare for the unknown & unknowable. In this case, it is better to be a jack-of-all trades rather than a master at one...at least when it comes to our definition of fitness.

The sole motivational drive for these three pathways is simply to ensure we are broad and general in our quest to achieve our goals. The more we vary and change how often we train in these pathways, the more well rounded we become.

5 comments:

  1. Off to Basel Switzerland again. Reid and I will be going throught the level 1 again.
    Mainly because of the L1 Test.

    Thanks for posting these key info's lately!
    Best wishes,
    rob

    ReplyDelete
  2. Chrissy bw144
    CRT today with my brown friend
    All PR's sq-120,shoulder- 75, dead-225
    Last PR for dead was 175... Looks like I was sandbagging!! Thanks for the coaching, Steve!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Chrissy- I guess the point if a total is to post your total not indiv! Total = 420

    ReplyDelete
  4. Today's demolition.."Courser"

    Complete 100 thrusters @ 135#. At the top of every minute perform 5 burpee's until the 100 thruster quota is met.

    rx. 27:00

    I will admit, not a very well thought out wod as we reached the 33rd rep a contingency plan was forced to be placed into action. This had two purposes, 1st to ensure completion of the workout and 2nd to maintain a exhausted intensity level. The new standard was that if you didn't complete any thrusters in a minute you were relieved of the subsequent round of burpee's. I had to use the bailout four times but it was better than not finishing at all. All in all it probably would've been a better workout @ 115# as the intensity would've remained for a much longer duration. Back to the drawing board for the next Thurs. colaboration.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "be impressed with intensity; not load or volume..." - greg glassman

    i'm sure displaying an exercise movement with epic amounts of weight can be impressive to watch (to watch, in the visual sense, being the key word here). but you can only maintain high power output i.e. intensity for so long before you crash and burn head first into a nosedive. continuing to move the same weight while intensity output diminishes is a tell-tale sign of fatigue, the body weakening, realizing the load was too heavy to begin with and opening yourself up for injury and sickness (in worst cases). doesn't sound good at all, when one's goal is to increase work capacity while performing movements at high intensity.

    interesting you chose to do this on today's post. but you nailed it on the head when you realized this should have been performed all together at 115#. there is no shame in scaling the load down in mid-wod, especially in cases such as this where you are treading in uncharted waters. welcome to the land of programming! we live and learn and find our limitations...sometimes the hard way.

    "we fail at the margins of our experience" - chuck carswell

    ReplyDelete